A Republican congressman who voted against federal legislation that would push states to acknowledge same-sex matrimony went to his very own boy’s gay wedding ceremony just a couple of days later on. Rep. Glenn Thompson of Pennsylvania seemingly does not believe gay wedding should-be protected, which need to have been very embarrassing as he made an impassioned speech concerning the love between their daughter and another man on wedding.

1. 
   Thompson is actually “excited” about their child’s brand-new partner.
   
   A statement given into
   
   Washington Post
   
   on Monday via Thompson’s press assistant, Maddison Stone browse: “Congressman and Mrs. Thompson happened to be thrilled to attend and commemorate their boy’s matrimony on tuesday evening as he started this brand new section in the life. The Thompsons are pleased to acceptance their new son-in-law in their household.” Why don’t we hope that relationship continues to be appropriate!
2. 
   The address Thompson gave at their boy’s wedding ceremony was truly something else entirely.
   
   “because they grow so that as they have a tiny bit earlier, we additionally hope and pray they’re going to find one real love so that they have the opportunity to enjoy that: Someone to grow old with,” Thompson stated, according to a
   transcript
   acquired by BuzzFeed. “We love it once they look for their particular one true-love, specially when they become a part of our very own households subsequently.” So is this man severe?!
3. 
   Hey, maybe Thompson was actually just voting along celebration outlines.
   
   How can we expect political figures to truly place the best interest of those they signify first in place of putting celebration very first and wanting to curry support in politics? Perhaps we ought to all be much more knowledge of Thompson and 156 some other Republican home people in opposing the Respect for wedding Act. No? i did not think so sometimes.
4. 
   Thompson’s push secretary is actually a grasp at gaslighting.
   
   Her explanation for Thompson’s vote? She had not one, but she performed claim that it failed to issue just how Thompson voted or perhaps the impact that vote may have on the liberties of millions of gay and interracial couples is to-be hitched. Really, its those really Democrats’ error! “This costs had been nothing more than an election-year messaging stunt for Democrats in Congress that have neglected to deal with traditional rising prices and out of hand costs at gas pumps and supermarkets,” rock said in an
   email
   on
   
   Centre Day-to-day Times
   
   . I… what?
5. 
   The hypocrisy went unacknowledged.
   
   Expected whether or not it ended up being quite rich for Thompson to vote against homosexual marriage after which visit their child’s gay wedding ceremony which, if Republicans had their unique means, won’t end up being legitimately permitted to take place whatsoever, Thompson didn’t come with feedback. Figures.